Abstract
Background and Objectives:
Laparoscopic anastomotic methods are not commonly used because of the cumbersome laparoscopic intracorporeal sutures and tying involved. The barbed suture is one of the various devices developed to simplify the placement of intracorporeal sutures. However, barbed sutures are not commonly used during reconstruction after radical gastrectomy in cancer patients or for single-layer entire-thickness running suturing for intestinal anastomoses. We describe the procedure for using barbed sutures and report on the short-term surgical outcomes.
Methods:
Between August 2012 and March 2014, 15-cm-long barbed sutures (V-Loc 180; Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) were used for laparoscopic intestinal anastomoses, including intestinal hole closure for esophagojejunal and gastrojejunal anastomoses after mechanical anastomoses and gastric wall closure after partial resection.
Results:
In total, 38 patients underwent 40 laparoscopic anastomoses (esophagojejunostomies, 26; gastrojejunostomies, 7; and simple closure of gastric defect, 7); no cases required conversion to open surgery. Two cases exhibited positive air leak test results during surgery (1 case of esophagojejunostomy and 1 case of simple closure of gastric defect). Two cases of intestinal obstruction were noted; of those, one patient with postoperative intestinal paresis (grade II) was managed conservatively, and the other underwent repeat laparoscopic surgery (grade IIIb) for internal herniation unrelated to V-Loc use. No postoperative complications at the anastomosis site and no surgery-related deaths were noted.
Conclusion:
Single-layer entire-thickness running suturing with the V-Loc 180 barbed suture after stapled side-to-side intestinal anastomosis was found to be safe and feasible in the reported cases.
Keywords: Laparoscopic surgery, Surgical Anastomosis, Suture Techniques
INTRODUCTION
Background
The use of laparoscopic gastrectomy has recently increased, and its indications have expanded to proximal and total gastrectomy. However, laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomosis involves a high degree of difficulty and complexity. In gastrointestinal surgery, careful intestinal anastomosis—particularly in cases of esophagojejunal anastomosis—is important, as anastomotic leakage may occasionally be fatal.1,2 Various methods of esophagojejunal or residual stomach anastomosis have been proposed. Stapled anastomosis is a fundamental step in all these methods, although it involves a hand-sewn technique.3–7 Thus, anastomotic methods are not commonly used because of the cumbersome laparoscopic intracorporeal sutures and tying involved. However, various devices have been developed to simplify the placement of intracorporeal sutures, and barbed suture is one such device.
V-Loc 180 (Covidien, Mansfield, MA, USA) is a new device for wound closure, and consists of a unidirectional barbed absorbable thread. Evenly spaced barbs have high tissue-adhesion ability, as they attach to tissue at numerous points. Moreover, the loop-end design avoids the need for tying a surgical knot (Figure 1). Clinical efficacy and suitability of barbed sutures have been reported in dermal closure8 and orthopedic surgery,9 and their intracorporeal use has also been indicated in the fields of urology10 and gynecology.11
Figure 1.
Open in a new tab
Some reports have described the use of barbed sutures for digestive anastomosis, including gastric bypass surgery in obese patients.12,13 However, only a few have reported on the use of barbed sutures for reconstruction after radical gastrectomy in patients with cancer or for esophagojejunal anastomosis.14,15 Although single-layer entire-thickness running sutures are convenient and very cost-effective,16 several reports describe the use of double-layer running sutures to ensure safety.
Herein, we describe the surgical procedure for intracorporeal single-layer entire-thickness running suturing using the V-Loc 180 device in cases involving esophagojejunal anastomosis and report on the short-term surgical outcomes.
METHODS
Patients
In total, 38 patients (25 men and 13 women) underwent laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing with the V-Loc 180 device (VLOCL0604; taper point, 1/2 circle/26 mm; size, 3-0; length, 15 cm; Covidien) at Toyama Prefectural Hospital between August 2012 and March 2014. Two patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with intracorporeal esophagojejunal and gastrojejunal anastomoses were also included. Thus, 40 cases undergoing laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing were included in this study.
The basic indication for laparoscopic gastrectomy in our department is cT1N0M0 cancer, and D1+ is the standard dissection range, based on the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (fourth edition) and Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines.17,18 The gastric submucosal tumor was partially resected, in principle. The diagnosis was made based on the findings of preoperative examinations, including gastrointestinal endoscopy, upper gastrointestinal series, and abdominal computed tomography. The data were retrospectively collected from medical records, operative reports, and histopathologic reports. Patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, indications, and operating procedures), surgery-related factors (operation time, blood loss, transition to laparotomy, intracorporeal suturing time, and additional suture), and operative factors (postoperative duration of hospital stay and intra-/postoperative complications) were analyzed. The Clavien–Dindo classification was used to categorize the postoperative complications; cases categorized as grade II and higher were regarded as having complications.
Surgical Procedures
Since 2012, laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG), and laparoscopy and endoscopy cooperative surgery (LECS) have been introduced and are performed based on the primary disease and localization of the tumor. For these procedures, the patient is placed in a reverse Trendelenburg position under general anesthesia. The first port is placed through the umbilicus by using an open method. A laparoscope is inserted via the umbilical port and 4 operating ports (bilateral subcostal and bilateral midabdominal). A Nathanson's liver retractor is placed just below the xiphoid process.
For LTG, the duodenum is divided with a regular 60-mm linear stapler, with a camel cartridge (Tri-Staple; Covidien), before the dissection of lymph node (LN) stations 7, 8a, and 9. After full mobilization of the stomach and completion of nodal dissection, the esophagogastric junction is divided with a regular 60-mm linear stapler, with a purple cartridge (Tri-Staple; Covidien). Thereafter, Roux-en-Y reconstruction is performed, including an esophagojejunal anastomosis according to the overlap method,6 with a 45-mm linear stapler, with a purple cartridge (Tri-Staple; Covidien). Single-layer entire-thickness running suturing with V-Loc 180 (Covidien) was used to close the intestinal hole. Furthermore, a side-to-side jejunojejunostomy was performed, including transumbilical minilaparotomy (usually 4 cm) using a 45-mm linear stapler, with a camel cartridge (Tri-Staple; Covidien), and hand-sewn sutures (3-0 Vicryl; Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA).
For LPG, the esophagus and stomach were divided with a 60-mm linear stapler, with a purple cartridge (Tri-Staple; Covidien). Thereafter, double-tract reconstruction was performed, and the jejunojejunal anastomosis and esophagojejunal anastomosis were performed in the same manner as for LTG. With regard to gastrojejunostomy, the decision on whether the anastomosis should be made transumbilically or intracorporeally was left to the surgeon's discretion. A side-to-side gastrojejunostomy was performed with a 45-mm linear stapler, with a purple cartridge (Tri-Staple; Covidien). Only intracorporeal suturing with V-Loc 180 (Covidien) was used. The mesentery defect was closed using 3-0 Vicryl sutures (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ, USA), whereas Petersen's defect was not closed in the LTG and LPG cases.
For LECS, after the gastric wall was devascularized laparoscopically, we penetrated the entire stomach layer endoscopically. Thereafter, a partial resection was performed laparoscopically. Single-layer entire-thickness running suturing with the V-Loc 180 (Covidien) device was used to close the gastric wall defect. The air leak test, performed with a nasal gastric tube, was used in all cases.
Intestinal Hole Closure with Barbed Sutures
Gastrointestinal hole closures were roughly divided into 2 groups: stapler insertion hole closure and gastric wall defect closure. Single-layer entire-thickness running sutures were placed by using the following method in all cases.
The first step in intestinal hole closure is to pass a needle through a loop (Figures 2a, 3a). The first stitch may become loose, as there are no barbs adjacent to the loop. Therefore, at the start of the closure site, 1 or 2 additional bites may be needed (Figures 2b, 3b). Thus, single-layer entire-thickness running sutures are placed, which tightens at each bite (Figure 2c, 3c). At the end of the closure site, 1 or 2 seromuscular bites are added after completing the intestinal hole closure, following which the suture is cut flush to the bowel without the necessity for tying a knot (Figures 2d, 3d). In cases with a broad suturing pitch, additional knotted sutures are made by using 3-0 Monocryl (Ethicon) based on the surgeon's discretion.
Figure 2.
Open in a new tab
Figure 3.
Open in a new tab
Postoperative Management
An abdominal drain, bladder catheter, and nasal gastric tube were routinely placed. Moreover, a postoperative radiographic contrast study was performed in all the patients. A few sips of water, a semifluid diet, and a soft blended diet were given to patients on postoperative days 3, 4, and 6, respectively. After the patient consumed the semifluid diet, the abdominal drainage tube was removed. On the first and third postoperative days, the amylase levels in the drain fluid were measured for the detection of a postoperative pancreatic fistula.
RESULTS
The background data of the patients are summarized in Table 1. These patients had a mean age of 68.8 ± 11.8 y (range, 37–88) and a body mass index of 22.2 ± 11.8 (range, 15.0–28.1). Of those, 31 patients had gastric cancer (28 with early cancer and 3 with pyloric stenosis), and 7 had gastric submucosal tumor. In total, 12 underwent LTG with Roux-en-Y reconstruction, 2 underwent laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with Roux-en Y reconstruction, 14 underwent LPG with double-tract reconstructions, 3 underwent gastrojejunal bypass, and 7 underwent partial gastrectomy. The anastomoses performed included esophagojejunostomies in 26, gastrojejunostomies in 7, and simple closures of gastric defect in 7 (Table 1). Of the 33 cases with esophagojejunostomies and gastrojejunostomies, additional knotted sutures were used in 13.
Table 1.
Background of the Patients
| Characteristic | Data |
|---|---|
| Patients, n | 38 |
| Intracorporeal anastomosis, n | 40 |
| Sex | |
| Male | 25 |
| Female | 13 |
| Mean age (years) | 68.8 ± 11.8 |
| Mean BMI (kg/m2) | 22.2 ± 3.2 |
| Indications, n | |
| Gastric cancer | 28 |
| Gastric cancer with pyloric stenosis | 3 |
| Gastric submucosal tumor | 7 |
| Procedures, n | |
| TG (Roux-en-Y reconstruction) | 12 |
| DG (Roux-en-Y reconstruction) | 2 |
| PG (Double tract reconstruction) | 14 |
| Bypass (Billoth-II) | 3 |
| Partial gastrectomy | 7 |
| Closure site using V-Loc, n | |
| Esophagojejunostomy | 26 |
| Gastrojejunostomy | 7 |
| Gastric defect | 7 |
Open in a new tab
BMI, body mass index; TG, total gastrectomy; DG, distal gastrectomy; PG, proximal gastrectomy.
The mean operative time for gastrectomy was 236 min (range, 155–340), and the estimated blood loss was 59 ml (range, 0–440). For partial gastrectomy (LECS) and gastrojejunal bypass, the mean operative times were 136 min (range, 72–200) and 90 min (range, 65–135), respectively. The mean duration of hospital stays for gastrectomy, LECS, and bypass were 14.1, 9.1, and 15 d, respectively (Table 2). No cases required conversion to open surgery. The overall mean suturing time was 10.5 min (range, 4.8–19.3). When considering only the suturing time involving V-Loc, the mean suturing time was 8.7 min (range, 4.8–13.8). In the 7 cases with gastric defects, knotted sutures were added in 4. The overall mean suturing time was 16.9 min (range, 9.1–21.2 min). The mean suturing time with V-Loc was 14.7 min (range, 9.1–34.9 min). No cases required conversion to open surgery.
Table 2.
Operative Data of Each Procedure: Surgery-Related Factors
| Factor | Gastrectomy | LECS | Bypass |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients, n | 28 | 7 | 3 |
| Mean operative time, min | 236 | 136 | 90 |
| Range | 155–340 | 72–200 | 65–135 |
| Estimated blood loss, ml (range) | 59 (0–440) | 4.4 (0–16) | Unmeasurable |
| Mean length of postoperative hospital stay, d (range) | 14.1 (8–28) | 9.1 (6–12) | 15 (11–19) |
Open in a new tab
Two cases with positive air leak test results (1 case of esophagojejunostomy and 1 case of simple closure of gastric defect) were noted during surgery after V-Loc suturing and were managed by adding knotted sutures. No gastrointestinal injuries and bleeding were noted during suturing.
When postoperative factors were examined, no complications related to the anastomosis site and no surgery-related deaths were noted. Pancreatic fistula was observed in 1 case, which was classified as Clavien–Dindo grade II. Furthermore, 2 cases of intestinal obstruction were noted. Of these, 1 patient had postoperative intestinal paresis (grade II) and was managed conservatively, and the other was found to have internal herniation originating from a cord-like adhesion between the jejunojejunal anastomosis and colon (grade IIIb) and underwent repeat laparoscopic surgery (Table 3).
Table 3.
Operative Data and Surgical Outcomes of Intestinal Hole Closure and Gastric Closure
| Outcomes | Intestinal Hole Closure | Gastric Defect Closure |
|---|---|---|
| Cases, n | 33 | 7 |
| Additional knotted suture, n cases | 13 | 4 |
| Mean total suturing time, min | 10.5 ± 3.3 | 20.6 ± 8.3 |
| Mean V-Loc suturing time, min | 8.7 ± 2.0 | 14.7 ± 3.5 |
| Intraoperative complications, n | ||
| Bleeding | 0 | 0 |
| Other organ injury | 0 | 0 |
| Positive air leak test | 1 | 1 |
| Postoperative complications, n | ||
| Anastomotic leakage | 0 | 0 |
| Anastomotic hemorrhage | 0 | 0 |
| Anastomotic stenosis | 0 | 0 |
| Pancreatitis | 1 | 0 |
| Intestinal obstruction | 2 | 0 |
Open in a new tab
DISCUSSION
The barbed suture, which obviates the need for tying knots, has emerged as a new device for wound closure. It has recently attracted interest as being useful in laparoscopic suturing. In the present study, we used V-Loc 180, which is an absorbable copolymer composed of glycolic acid and trimethylene carbonate—the same materials that are used in Maxon (Covidien). The tensile strength is maintained at ∼50% at 21 d, and complete absorption is observed in 180 d. In the current cases, we used a thread length of 15 cm, and it had excellent operability and maneuverability in the abdominal cavity. The effective length, comprising the barbed portion, is ∼12 cm.
Although cases wherein a gastric wall defect cannot be closed by a single thread due to a relatively short effective length have been noted, the use of a longer length of V-Loc may not be cost effective. Hence, we used a length of 15 cm due to the associated operability and to facilitate easy suturing.
The barb and loop-end design of this device enables its adherence to tissues without the need for tying a knot. However, V-Loc does not have any barbs within ∼1 cm from the loop-end (Figure 1), which is disadvantageous, in that it does not permit tight tissue adhesion at the first bite. Therefore, we initiated suturing from the seromuscular portion, and the third bite was placed at the start of the intestinal incision, to avoid loosening. As tying a knot is not recommended in the barbed portion, because the thread could be cut, the suturing was completed by adding 2 bites beyond the end of intestinal incision, after which the suture was cut without any knot. Because of the additional bites, the tissue adhesion ability became stronger. However, the presence of a long barbed suture outside of the bowel has been reported to cause intestinal obstruction,19 and therefore, cutting this suture flush at the bowel is important. In the present study, 1 case of grade IIIb intestinal obstruction was noted, because of the thread between the colon and jejunojejunal anastomosis, and was not related to the use of V-Loc sutures.
The “knotless” concept is being widely accepted in surgical procedures in various body locations as well as in fragile tissue, such as in cases of peritoneum closure.20–22 For intestinal anastomosis, this procedure has been shown to yield a shorter suturing time and similar bursting pressure, as compared to common monofilament sutures in preliminary research and animal models.23,24 Furthermore, its usefulness and safety have been described in several large-scale trials involving laparoscopic bypass in obese patients.15,25,26 In patients with gastric cancer, barbed sutures have been used as a device for intestinal hole closure after side-to-side intestinal stapled anastomosis.14 However, barbed sutures have primarily been used for gastrointestinal anastomosis as double-layer running sutures,14,15,26 and their safety has been described. Nevertheless, the use of single-layer entire-thickness running sutures is more desirable, considering the shorter surgical time and ease of suturing.16 Although the present study was not controlled, the suturing time was found to be relatively short, and no anastomotic leakage was observed. Furthermore, we conclude that single-layer entire-thickness running sutures are acceptable and safe, as they offer tight closure by barbed sutures. In addition, no anastomotic stenosis was observed, although we believe that this result is attributable to the side-to-side stapled anastomosis, not to the V-Loc device.
An important limitation of V-Loc use may be the development of anastomotic leakage due to seromuscular injury, when V-Loc has been used for staple line reinforcement.27 However, single-layer entire-thickness running sutures with the V-Loc device showed a higher pressure and tightness test value (defined as the pressure that can be exerted by the thread until a balloon bursts) and no ruptures or leaks in a cadaver study.28 These findings indicate that the unidirectional, evenly spaced barbs distribute the tension equally because they attach to the tissue at numerous points. Therefore, it appears that intestinal injury is a result of technical laparoscopy-related factors, such as the hand-sewn technique under direct vision, rather than a result of V-Loc itself.
In this report, 2 cases showed positive results in an intraoperative air leak test. We noted that surgeons encountered difficulty in suturing because the anastomotic hole became gradually smaller as suturing progressed. However, to obtain a more secure suture and to avoid a positive air leak test result, it is essential to ensure tight closure as suturing progresses. In addition, of all the 40 case series, additional knotted sutures were used in 17. We consider the double-layer method to provide the most reliable anastomosis possible; therefore, additional knotted sutures are added at the surgeon's discretion depending on intraoperative findings. We do not recommend the use of barbed suture alone; a reliable suturing method is important. Thus, we note that there were no cases of anastomotic leakage.
CONCLUSION
Single-layer entire-thickness running suturing with the V-Loc 180 device after stapled side-to-side intestinal anastomosis is considered to be a safe and feasible option. However, a greater number of such cases and careful and longer follow-up are necessary.
Contributor Information
Tomoya Tsukada, Department of Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Department of Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan.; Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan.
Masahide Kaji, Department of Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Department of Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan..
Jun Kinoshita, Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Department of Gastroenterologic Surgery, Kanazawa University, Ishikawa, Japan..
Koichi Shimizu, Department of Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Department of Surgery, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama, Japan..
References:
- 1.Sano T, Sasako M, Yamamoto S, et al. Gastric cancer surgery: morbidity and mortality results from a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing D2 and extended para-aortic lymphadenectomy Japan Clinical Oncology Group study 9501. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:2767–2773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lee MS, Lee JH, Park do J, Lee HJ, Kim HH, Yang HK.Comparison of short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in gastric cancer patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2598–2605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hosogi H, Yoshimura F, Yamaura T, Satoh S, Uyama I, Kanaya S.Esophagogastric tube reconstruction with stapled pseudo-fornix in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a novel technique proposed for Siewert type II tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2014;399:517–523. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ahn SH, Jung DH, Son SY, Lee CM, Park DJ, Kim HH.Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17:562–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yoshikawa T, Hayashi T, Aoyama T, et al. Laparoscopic esophagojejunostomy using the EndoStitch and a circular stapler under a direct view created by the ENDOCAMELEON. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16:609–614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Inaba K, Satoh S, Ishida Y, et al. Overlap method: novel intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211:e25–e29. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Nunobe S, Hiki N, Tanimura S, et al. Three-step esophagojejunal anastomosis with atraumatic anvil insertion technique after laparoscopic total gastrectomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:1520–1525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rubin JP, Hunstad JP, Polynice A, et al. A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing absorbable barbed sutures versus conventional absorbable sutures for dermal closure in open surgical procedures. Aesthet Surg J. 2014;34:272–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Smith EL, DiSegna ST, Shukla PY, Matzkin EG.Barbed versus traditional sutures: closure time, cost, and wound related outcomes in total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:283–287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tewari AK, Srivastava A, Sooriakumaran P, et al. Use of a novel absorbable barbed plastic surgical suture enables a “self-cinching” technique of vesicourethral anastomosis during robot-assisted prostatectomy and improves anastomotic times. J Endourol. 2010;24:1645–1650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Nawfal AK, Eisenstein D, Theoharis E, Dahlman M, Wegienka G.Vaginal cuff closure during robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparing Vicryl to barbed sutures. JSLS. 2012;16:525–529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tyner RP, Clifton GT, Fenton SJ.Hand-sewn gastrojejunostomy using knotless unidirectional barbed absorbable suture during laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1360–1366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Blasi V, Facy O, Goergen M, Poulain V, De Magistris L, Azagra JS.Barbed versus usual suture for closure of the gastrojejunal anastomosis in laparoscopic gastric bypass: a comparative trial. Obes Surg. 2013;23:60–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee SW, Nomura E, Tokuhara T, et al. Laparoscopic technique and initial experience with knotless, unidirectional barbed suture closure for staple-conserving, delta-shaped gastroduodenostomy after distal gastrectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2011;213:e39–45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Facy O, De Blasi V, Goergen M, Arru L, De Magistris L, Azagra JS.Laparoscopic gastrointestinal anastomoses using knotless barbed sutures are safe and reproducible: a single-center experience with 201 patients. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3841–3845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ceraldi CM, Rypins EB, Monahan M, Chang B, Sarfeh IJ.Comparison of continuous single layer polypropylene anastomosis with double layer and stapled anastomoses in elective colon resections. Am Surg. 1993;59:168–171. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:113–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14:101–112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Salminen HJ, Tan WS, Jayne DG.Three cases of small bowel obstruction after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy using the V-Loc suture. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:601–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Takayama S, Nakai N, Shiozaki M, Ogawa R, Sakamoto M, Takeyama H.Use of barbed suture for peritoneal closure in transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;4:177–179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Patri P, Beran C, Stjepanovic J, Sandberg S, Tuchmann A, Christian H.V-Loc, a new wound closure device for peritoneal closure–is it safe? A comparative study of different peritoneal closure systems. Surg Innov. 2011;18:145–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Deffieux X, Pachy F, Donnadieu AC, Trichot C, Faivre E, Fernandez H.Peritoneal closure using absorbable knotless device during laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. J Gynecol Obstet Biol. 2011;40:65–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Demyttenaere SV, Nau P, Henn M, et al. Barbed suture for gastrointestinal closure: a randomized control trial. Surg Innov. 2009;16:237–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Nelson BB, Hassel DM.In vitro comparison of V-Loc versus Biosyn in a one-layer end-to-end anastomosis of equine jejunum. Vet Surg. 2014;43:80–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Milone M, Di Minno MN, Galloro G, et al. Safety and efficacy of barbed suture for gastrointestinal suture: a prospective and randomized study on obese patients undergoing gastric bypass. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23:756–759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Costantino F, Dente M, Perrin P, Sarhan FA, Keller P.Barbed unidirectional V-Loc 180 suture in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a study comparing unidirectional barbed monofilament and multifilament absorbable suture. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3846–3851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bülbüller N, Aslaner A, Oner OZ, et al. Comparison of four different methods in staple line reinforcement during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;25:6:985–990. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nemecek E, Negrin L, Beran C, Nemecek R, Hollinsky C.The application of the V-Loc closure device for gastrointestinal sutures: a preliminary study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3830–3834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
 | MoneySmart.hk)